Saturday, May 27, 2017

Do We Have Accurate Copies of the New Testament Documents?

I have shown in previous blogs that it is reasonable to conclude that the New Testament documents were written early, and that they are reliable in that they are corroborated by outside sources and they have not changed over time.  The next question of reliability comes from the fact that we do not have any of the original documents.  So, how do we know that what we have now says the same thing as the original?
The answer comes from the method used to reconstruct ancient texts. Greg Koukl, from Stand to Reason, uses recreating an old recipe as a good example of how we can know that we have an accurate copy of the original writings.[1]  Suppose you lose your copy of a family recipe that has been handed down to you from your great-great-great grandmother 200 years ago.  Luckily, several hand-written copies have been made throughout the years (before copy machines) and handed down to all the ancestors, so you call all your relatives and collect all their copies – let’s say you are able to collect 25 hand-written copies.  After all are collected, they are all compared – but immediately you notice some differences!  20 of the copies are virtually identical except for some misspellings or abbreviations.  Of the remaining 5 copies, one lists the ingredients in a different order, another two have phrases inverted (“mix and chop” instead of “chop and mix”), one includes adding cayenne pepper (an ingredient that isn’t on any other copy), and one leaves out cumin (an ingredient that is on every other copy). 
From just these 25 copies, is it possible to reconstruct the original? Most of the differences in the copies are inconsequential. The misspellings, the different order of ingredients, and the abbreviations all have exactly the same meaning.  The inverted phrase and the different ingredients can all easily be resolved by looking at the other copies.  It is more probable that 1 or 2 people would make copying errors instead of 23 or 24 people making a mistake.  Even if there were more mistakes, you could still reconstruct the originals to a high level of confidence by comparing all the copies.
You would have more confidence in reconstructing the original documents if you had more copies and if those copies were dated more closely to the original writings.  So, just how many copies of the New Testament documents do we have?  There are about 5700 hand written Greek manuscripts and over 9000 manuscripts in other languages such as Syriac, Coptic, Latin, and Arabic.  Included in these manuscripts are hundreds of copies of the gospels. The earliest surviving copy is dated to within 25 years of the original writings. Not all of these ancient manuscripts are complete New Testaments, and some are dated as late as the tenth century, but the point is that there are a lot of copies that were spread out over the Middle East, Europe, Asia, and Northern Africa. With so many copies, it is easy to reconstruct what the original documents must have said.
Many have heard the textual critic Bart Ehrman disagree about the accuracy of the current New Testament; he gives the impression in his popular writings that what we have now is corrupted and uncertain. It turns out that Bart Ehrman misrepresents the data to lay audiences. In his scholarly papers – the writings that must be peer reviewed – he agrees that textual scholars have been able to reconstruct the New Testament documents to about 99% accuracy.[2]  Daniel B. Wallace, director of the Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts, says of Ehrman’s popular writings:

This is a gross misrepresentation of the facts. Even Ehrman admitted in the appendix to Misquoting Jesus, “Essential Christian beliefs are not affected by textual variants in the manuscript tradition of the New Testament.” The extent to which, the reasons for which, and the nature of which the orthodox scribes corrupted the New Testament has been overblown. And the fact that such readings can be detected by comparison with the readings of other ancient manuscripts indicates that the fingerprints of the original text are still to be seen in the extant manuscripts.[3]
Because of the tremendous numbers of surviving copies, it is reasonable to conclude that we have an accurate copy of the original New Testament documents.





No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.